MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Context‐dependent Effect of Transforming Growth Factor Beta on Valve Interstitial Cell Growth in Vitro

2010· article· en· W947398050 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chen Xi Li, Alan Rosenthal, Avrum I. Gotlieb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell growthContext (archaeology)Transforming growth factorHeart valveInterstitial cellGrowth factorCell biologyCellTransforming growth factor betaCTGFCell adhesionChemistryBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Valve interstitial cells (VICs) are the most prevalent cell type in heart valves. We showed that in the early stages of VIC wound repair transforming growth factor beta (TGF‐β) promotes VIC proliferation and repair (A. Liu et al. Am J Pathol 2008; 173:1275–1285). However, the effect of TGF‐β on VIC growth independent of injury is poorly understood. Materials and Methods We used normal subconfluent VIC monolayer cultures to test the hypothesis that TGF‐β enhances VIC proliferation. Control and TGF‐β treated VICs were plated at low density. Cell number and proliferation (bromodeoxyuridine) were quantified. Cell morphology was observed and the extent of VIC adhesion to the substratum was quantified using a trypsin adhesion assay. Results TGF‐β significantly decreased cell number and altered cell morphology as cells were mostly rhomboid‐shaped as opposed to spindle‐shaped. Cell proliferation was significantly inhibited and treated cells showed significantly more adhesion to the substratum, which may contribute to the observed growth inhibition. Conclusion The effect of TGF‐β on VIC growth is context dependent, allowing it to play a dual role by preventing excessive heart valve growth in normal adult conditions and promoting cell proliferation in the early stages of repair, as we reported previously. Supported by a grant from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (grant NA6204).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→