MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W94939952

Inflexión del soberanismo de Québec

2011· article· es· W94939952 on OpenAlex
Juan Antonio López Cordero, Eric Guntermann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTemas para el debate · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCatalanPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las elecciones federales celebradas en Canada el 2 de mayo supusieron un reves historico para el secesionismo quebeques. El Bloc Quebecois, principal candidatura secesionista en los comicios federales, ha perdido en 2011 casi un 40% de sus votantes de 2008, obteniendo tan solo 4 de los 75 escanos de Quebec en la Camara de los Comunes, y la confianza de menos del 24% de los quebequeses. El Bloc Quebecois, que desde su irrupcion en la Camara en 1993 habia sido invariablemente la primera fuerza en la provicia de Quebec, se ha visto ampliamente rebasado por el Nuevo Partido Democratico (socialdemocratas federalistas), que ha obtenido el 43% de los votos en Quebec y 59 escanos. Un vuelco que situa a las puertas de la insignificancia al Bloc Quebecois, espejo de movimientos nacionalistas en toda Europa (y en particular, del nacionalismo catalan).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it