Re: GreenLight <sup>TM</sup> Laser (XPS) Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Randomized Controlled Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyLetter to the Editor/Errata1 Nov 2015Re: GreenLightTM Laser (XPS) Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Randomized Controlled StudyA. M. Elshal, M. A. Elkoushy, A. R. El-Nahas, A. M. Shoma, A. Nabeeh, S. Carrier and M. M. Elhilali∗ J Urol 2015; 193: 927–934. Kevin C. Zorn, Pierre Alain Hueber, and Ricardo R. Gonzalez Kevin C. ZornKevin C. Zorn , Pierre Alain HueberPierre Alain Hueber , and Ricardo R. GonzalezRicardo R. Gonzalez View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.107AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Re: GreenLightTM Laser (XPS) Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Randomized Controlled Study." The Journal of Urology, 194(5), pp. 1513–1514 References 1 : Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol2012; 188: 216. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Feasibility and efficacy of Thulium:YAG laser enucleation (VapoEnucleation) of the prostate. World J Urol2009; 27: 541. Google Scholar 3 : Change in serum prostate specific antigen concentration after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a marker for completeness of adenoma resection?. J Endourol2005; 19: 550. Google Scholar 4 : Common trend: move to enucleation—is there a case for GreenLight enucleation? Development and description of the technique. World J Urol2015; 33: 539. Google Scholar © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 194Issue 5November 2015Page: 1513-1514 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Kevin C. Zorn Financial interest and/or other relationship with American Medical Systems. More articles by this author Pierre Alain Hueber More articles by this author Ricardo R. Gonzalez Financial interest and/or other relationship with American Medical Systems. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".