MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W95064387

Perceived Threat and Host Community Acculturation Orientations toward Immigrants: Comparing Flemings in Belgium and Francophones in Quebec

2004· article· en· W95064387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationImmigrationFrenchHumanitiesEthnologyDominance (genetics)SociologySocial psychologyPsychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT/RESUME This empirical study compared the acculturation orientations of host communities whose ethnolinguistic vitality was perceived as somewhat threatened in two national settings: Fancophones in Quebec (N = 206) and Flemings in Belgium (N = 213). Undergraduates completed the Host Community Acculturation Scale (r-HCAS) toward valued and devalued immigrants. The respondents also completed social psychological scales including identification to national groups, ethnocentric and social dominance ideologies, security of ingroup identity, and perceived threat from immigrants. Results showed that in both settings, integrationism and individualism were the most strongly endorsed acculturation orientations. Assimilationism, segregationism, and exclusionism were more strongly endorsed for devalued than for valued immigrants. Overall, Quebec Francophones held more polarized acculturation orientations toward valued versus devalued immigrants compared to Flemings in Belgium. Social psychological correlates differentiating Quebec Francophones and Flemings in Belgium help account for the more polarized acculturation orientations obtained with Quebec Francophone undergraduates. Cette etude empirique a compare les orientations d'acculturation de communautes d'accueil dont la vitalite ethnolinguistique est perque commc etant precaire: les francophones du Quebec (N=206) et les Flamands de Belgique (N=213). Des etudiants universitaires quebecois et flamands ont complete l'Echelle d'Acculturation de la Communaute d'Accueil (EACA-r) a l'egard d'immigrants valorises et devalorises. Les repondants ont aussi complete des echelles socio-psychologiques incluant l'identification 'a divers groupes nationaux et politiques, les croyances ethnocentriques et de dominance sociale, la perception de securite identitaire et le sentiment d'etre menace par la presence des immigrants. Les resultats demontrent que les Quebecois francophones et les Flamands ont prefere les orientations d'acculturation integrationniste et individualiste. Les orientations assimilationiste, segregationniste et exclusionniste ont ete endossees plus fortement a l'egard des immigrants devalorises qu'a l'egard des immigrants valorises. En general, les Quebecois francophones etaient plus polarises que les Flamands dans leur endossement des orientations d'acculturation envers les immigrants valorises et devalorises. Les correlats sociopsychologiques foumissent des pistes pour expliquer les orientations d'acculturation plus polarisees des Quebecois francophones comparativement aux Flamands. Emerging research on acculturation processes from the perspective of host community members tends to treat the dominant society as culturally and linguistically homogeneous. However, the coexistence of subnational host communities within receiving countries is the rule rather than the exception in multiethnic societies (Fishman 1999). Countries of settlement are often made up of a dominant majority and subnational indigenous communities whose linguistic, cultural, or religious differences are the source of intergroup tensions that existed well before the arrival of immigrants (Bourhis 2001a; McAndrew and Gagnon 2000). Such is the case in Belgium and Canada. The first goal of this study was to compare the acculturation orientations of two double status host communities who make up the dominant majority at the regional level (Quebec/Flanders) but who remain a linguistic and cultural minority at the continental level (North America/European Union). This study proposes that host community members who feel less secure linguistically, culturally, and politically are also less likely to be welcoming in their acculturation orientations toward immigrants. In line with recent studies, we also expect that host community members from both Quebec and Flanders are likely to endorse more welcoming acculturation orientations toward valued than devalued immigrants. IMMIGRANT-HOST COMMUNITY RELATIONS IN QUEBEC AND FLANDERS In Canada, Francophones and Anglophones are two host communities to which immigrants may acculturate. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it