MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W950750354 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-122-1_7

Brown Pride in a College Classroom

2013· book-chapter· en· W950750354 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Darius KressStonebanks

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Research Studies
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrideTone (literature)Field (mathematics)AestheticsArtPsychologyVisual artsPolitical scienceLiteratureLawMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To those of you who have, are or are thinking about entering the field of education, let me share my experience in the hopes that it will possibly validate your own. I have been the confusing color of Brown all my life. Not that it is confusing for those of us who are Brown; it just seems to be a difficult shade of skin tone for others to wrap their heads around. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicHigher Education Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207