MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W950904887

小麦抗叶锈基因Lr24、Lr35的STS、SCAR标记在近等基因系(NILs)上的特异性验证

2008· article· zh· W950904887 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
LIU Li, 陈云芳, 刘华梁, 杨文香, 张汀, 刘大群

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2008
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

用一套分别含有不同抗叶锈基因的53个以Thatcher为遗传背景的近等基因系(near-isogeniclines,NILs)对已报道的分别与抗叶锈基因Lr24和Lr35连锁的STS、SCAR进行特异性验证。结果对于与Lr24连锁的STS标记,在53个NILs中只在TcLr24亲本中扩增出片段大小与报道相同的310bp的条带,在TcLr35中也扩增出了一条片段,但片段大小不同于310bp约为270bp。对于与Lr35连锁的SCAR标记,只在TcLr35亲本中扩增出片段大小为900bp的条带,与报道片段大小一致。验证结果表明与抗病基因Lr24和Lr35连锁的STS、SCAR分子标记在NILs中特异性都较好,进一步证明了这两个分子标记可方便地用于小麦抗叶锈基因Lr24、Lr35的分子标记辅助选择育种。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207