MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W95159488

Developments in Canadian Maritime Law

2011· article· en· W95159488 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher J. Giaschi

Bibliographic record

VenueDiritto marittimo · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBARGECrewDeckPort (circuit theory)CapeMarine engineeringEngineeringAeronauticsMeteorologyGeographyOceanographyHistoryArchaeologyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Koprino turned south off Cape Beale with a Barge in tow not made of steel; As Barge and Ship took the Island's lee both travelled well on a flat calm sea; The voyage was easy well into the night with Barge and tow line always in sight; But off Carmanagh the wind grew stronger the quiet sea was no longer; The wooden Barge soon went down but Koprino had not run aground; The question is what caused the wreck The Crew, the Barge or the house on deck? A second query may arise Who bears the loss insurance-wise?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0240.010
Scholarly communication0.0160.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiritto marittimoSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207