MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W95166320 · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4192-6_02

DISCOVERING THE COMMUNITY: THE BERNE FRAGMENTS OF 1794

2006· book-chapter· en· W95166320 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua D. Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtueHegelianismNatural (archaeology)Environmental ethicsSociologyPhilosophyAestheticsEpistemologyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the “Berne fragments”1 Hegel's pragmatic concern for the human spirit's satisfaction through folk-religion gives way to a philosophic engagement with the internal relationship between its natural needs, which we identified in the previous chapter as being at home in the world and virtue. This supplanting of the folk-religion project by the human-spirit project carries with it more than a change of emphasis. It marks the introduction into his thought, first, of the community as an end in itself equal to human satisfaction and, then, of the communalization of human needs. In this way, the Berne fragments mark the transformation of Hegel's original Problemstellung from one dominated by the logic of virtue or self-development to one centred on the logic of being at home in the world or participating in a community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicEconomic and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207