MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W952964333 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r245-05

Hydraulic Modeling of Deep Tunnel Provides Cost Savings

2012· article· en· W952964333 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taymour El-Hosseiny, Karen Reinhart, Mary Cherian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Agency (philosophy)Environmental scienceEngineeringCivil engineeringGeographyArchaeologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2005, the City of Columbus, Ohio submitted a plan to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to manage its wet weather flow which includes a list of proposed improvements to eliminate or mitigate combined sewer overflows (CSOs). Critical components of the plan are the Olentangy-Scioto interceptor sewer (OSIS) augmentation relief sewer (OARS), the construction of CSO high rate treatment, and a 10 MG storage facility to meet the desired level of control of zero overflow in a typical year. The total estimated cost of these three components in 2005 dollars was $396 million.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207