MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W953336875

长雄野生稻(OryzaIongistaminata)全基因组Fosmid文库构建

2012· article· zh· W953336875 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
李丽娟, 蔡晶, 张石来, 王荔, 胡凤益

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2012
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTransgenic Plants and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFosmidComputer scienceChemistryBiochemistryMetagenomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

长雄野生稻(0.10ngistaminata)起源于非洲,具有和亚洲栽培稻相同的AA基因组,是栽培稻改良的重要遗传资源。本研究构建了长雄野生稻全基因组fosmid文库,共获得33.6万克隆,文库的平均插入片段大小约为40kb,其中94.7%的克隆插入片段大小在30~50kb之间。挑取其中约11万克隆并保存,可覆盖10倍栽培稻基因组,对任意基因或序列的筛选概率达到了99.99%。将剩余的22万个克隆进行了末端配对测序,显示其有助于长雄野生稻全基因组测序的拼接。所构建的fosmid文库为筛选和克隆长雄野生稻的有利基因提供了研究材料。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207