MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W954051828

Development of 3D metallic nano-structures for sensing applications

2012· dissertation· en· W954051828 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohamadreza Najiminaini

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNano-NanotechnologyMaterials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction of a light with an array of sub-wavelength holes in a thin metal film has given rise to a unique optical property, the so-called extraordinary optical transmission (EOT). Not only does EOT of a sub-wavelength hole array exceed the incident light on the holes, but also could surpass the diffraction limit of the light and provide an intensified electric field at vicinity of the holes. These phenomena have introduced many new possibilities in the field of photonic applications. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensing is one of the most common applications of a metallic sub-wavelength hole array structure and it results from EOT spectral shifts due to changes in the refractive index of materials on the top or bottom of the structure. In this thesis, novel sub-wavelength hole array structures with a surface plasmon energy matching property between the top and bottom of the structure have been fabricated and tested in a bulk-SPR sensing application. The numerical and experimental results demonstrated improved SPR sensitivities and higher electric field intensity at the edges of the holes at the EOT wavelength for an energy-matched structure compared to a conventional sub-wavelength hole array structure. However, in order to fabricate the novel structure, two systematic studies were performed to elucidate the effects of various geometrical parameters and different composition and thickness of the adhesion layers on the EOT properties of sub-wavelength hole array structures. Many other applications of a sub-wavelength hole array could potentially benefit from these novel structures due to their enhanced EOT properties over conventional structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicNear-Field Optical MicroscopyFrench-language works237,207