MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W95613201 · doi:10.4000/sociologies.3199

Sortir de la rue : une lutte pour la reconnaissance à l’heure de l’individualisme avancé

2021· article· fr· W95613201 on OpenAlex
Annamaria Colombo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologieS · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesContext (archaeology)Political scienceSociologyArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche analysant le processus de sortie de la rue des jeunes à Montréal. Les résultats obtenus conduisent à considérer ce dernier comme une lutte pour la reconnaissance dans le contexte actuel d’individualisation croissante du lien social. Dans ce contexte, les tentatives des jeunes pour s’approprier une position sociale peuvent prendre des formes inhabituelles et bricolées telles que l’appropriation de la rue et la sortie de celle-ci. Aspirant à une certaine normalité, les jeunes rencontrés ont investi des contextes relationnels plus ou moins associés à la rue. Ils se sont approprié les manifestations de reconnaissance qu’ils y ont trouvées afin de construire leur sortie de la rue, comprise comme un processus de repositionnement identitaire. Or il ressort également que le sens attribué à ces manifestations de reconnaissance est lourdement influencé par les formes de reconnaissance parentales vécues durant l’enfance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it