Sortir de la rue : une lutte pour la reconnaissance à l’heure de l’individualisme avancé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche analysant le processus de sortie de la rue des jeunes à Montréal. Les résultats obtenus conduisent à considérer ce dernier comme une lutte pour la reconnaissance dans le contexte actuel d’individualisation croissante du lien social. Dans ce contexte, les tentatives des jeunes pour s’approprier une position sociale peuvent prendre des formes inhabituelles et bricolées telles que l’appropriation de la rue et la sortie de celle-ci. Aspirant à une certaine normalité, les jeunes rencontrés ont investi des contextes relationnels plus ou moins associés à la rue. Ils se sont approprié les manifestations de reconnaissance qu’ils y ont trouvées afin de construire leur sortie de la rue, comprise comme un processus de repositionnement identitaire. Or il ressort également que le sens attribué à ces manifestations de reconnaissance est lourdement influencé par les formes de reconnaissance parentales vécues durant l’enfance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".