Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose d’examiner, dans une approche ergonomique, les relations entre l’âge et le travail sous l’angle des temps, comme problème croisant des temporalités multiples, sociétales, gestionnaires, collectives et individuelles. Ces différentes temporalités règlent le temps et cadrent les relations âge/travail dans des configurations débouchant sur des conflits temporels. L’activité de travail peut être alors conçue comme un carrefour temporel combinant, de manière synchronique et diachronique, ces temporalités. Elle devient un espace de régulation des temporalités où se joue la capacité à produire du temps. Les relations âge/travail sont examinées au travers de trois terrains de recherche : le travail répétitif ou le temps rétréci, le travail collectif en tant qu’il règle le temps sur le rythme du métier, la transmission des savoirs professionnels entre anciens et nouveaux, comme expérience temporelle qui transcende les temporalités individuelles du cycle de vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".