Efficacité des programmes d'accès à l'égalité (PAE) à l'intention des minorités visibles et bénéfices escomptés par les employeurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Je souhaite remercier en premier lieu Madame Marie-Thérèse Chicha pour I' encadrement exceptionnel qu'elle m'a offert ainsi que pour son support lors de chacune des étapes de la rédaction de ce mémoire.Je souhaite également remercier Messieurs Jean-Guy Bergeron et Michel Coum pour leurs précieuses suggestions et commentaires qui ont permis d'enrichir la qualité de ce mémoire.Je m'en voudrais de ne pas témoigner ma gratitude à mes parents, Madame Georgette Bilodeau-Charest et Monsieur Émilien Charest, qui ont accepté de faire bien des sacrifices afin de me permettre de mener à terme ce projet.Finalement, je voudrais aussi remercier mes amis et proches qui sauront se reconnaître et qui, de bien des manières ont su m'encourager au cours des ans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".