MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W958650613 · doi:10.1353/uni.2015.0001

Border Crossings: Depictions of Canadian-American Relations in First World War Children’s Literature

2015· article· en· W958650613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth A. Galway

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œLion and the unicorn · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllegiancePatriotismIdeologyPoliticsDutyCitizenshipWorld War IIAmerican literatureSociologySpanish Civil WarGender studiesLawMasculinityHistoryPolitical scienceLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Border Crossings:Depictions of Canadian-American Relations in First World War Children’s Literature Elizabeth A. Galway (bio) Alan Richardson suggests that “the construction of childhood in an age of revolution and reform is neither a politically disinterested nor an ideologically neutral matter” (qtd. in Thacker and Webb 19). The same is true of much of the literature written for child readers during periods of political upheaval and, as Karin Westman observes, “during times of war . . . the ideological work of 'children’s literature' carries greater weight and has a wider reach” (216). Evidence of politics and ideology is found in children’s literature produced during the First World War, when many writers constructed children and childhood in ways that would suit wartime needs and actively cultivated a sense of patriotic duty and pro-war sentiment in young readers. This fostering of patriotism was often achieved by contrasting a nation with its enemies, and by measuring it against its allies, a practice that is evident in North American children’s literature from the First World War. This article will explore how Canada and the United States were represented by wartime children’s writers as part of an effort to ensure the allegiance of young readers to their respective nations, to cultivate particular notions of masculinity, and to promote good citizenship. The works of children’s literature discussed in this article represent some of the many ways in which authors portrayed each of these nations. Canadian-American relations changed over the course of the war as each nation’s participation in the conflict developed and, consequently, literary depictions of these relations were neither uniform nor static. Prior to WWI, the relationship between the two countries was a topic of interest for many Canadian children’s writers. Some, seeing the larger and rapidly expanding nation to the south as an economic, political, and even a military threat, sought to cultivate anti-American sentiment in young readers. Others, believing [End Page 100] that Canada would prosper by developing its association with America, particularly by strengthening economic ties, presented it more favorably. WWI children’s literature shows that these competing views continued to circulate well into the war years and that America continued to be a subject of interest for Canadian children’s writers. Canadian writers utilized depictions of the United States to help construct an array of visions of Canadian national identity, which included highlighting the nation’s place within the British Empire, picturing Canada as part of a newly powerful North American alliance, and expressing a desire for greater independence from both Britain and the United States. While Canadian writers often treated the United States as a subject of their writing, most American children’s authors paid little attention to Canada prior to 1914. If they did, they tended to either picture Canada as part of Britain, with little distinct identity of its own, or presented it as an extension of the United States.1 Following the outbreak of war, however, more Americans turned their attention to Canada, perhaps because Canadian military achievements made the nation a more visible presence, or perhaps simply as part of a general interest in the events of the war of which Canada was a part from the outset. Nevertheless, discussions of Canada in American children’s literature remained few relative to discussions of other major players in the war such as Britain and Germany. There has not been extensive critical attention paid to American children’s literature from this period, and where it has, the focus has not been on references to Canada. But depictions of Canadians and Canada in American wartime children’s literature, though not widespread, reveal a complexity of attitudes toward America’s involvement in the conflict, including divergent views about whether the United States should remain neutral and anxiety over whether allegiance to the nation was being weakened by the old-world ties of many of its citizens. The widespread belief that inculcating a sense of national identity and patriotism in the young is the best means by which to secure ongoing loyalty to the nation meant that children were seen as a crucial audience for lessons about citizenship and nationhood. Revisiting some...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œLion and the unicornSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207