MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Photothermal Radiometric Frequency-Swept Studies of Kinetics Process In P-Si Wafers

2002· article· en· W959803191 on OpenAlexaff
M. Rodríguez, Andreas Mandelis, P. J. Mendoza, José Ángel García García

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Sciences/Supplements Proceedings of 11th International Conference of Photoacoustic and Photothermal Phenomena · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaferMaterials scienceFluenceLaserAnnealing (glass)OpticsPhotothermal therapyOptoelectronicsRadiometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency-swept (chirped) infrared photothermal radiometry was combined with conventional single-frequency modulation of an Ar ion laser beam to yield a quantitative study of the surface-state annealing process induced by the low fluence laser beam on n and p-type Si wafers. The appearance of signal transient was found to be strongly dependent on the electronic quality of the wafer surface and was absent in the thermally oxidized p-si wafer. The low injection carrier minority lifetimes and diffusion coefficient were not affected by the laser-surface interaction, but the front surface recombination velocity strongly decreased with the time exposure, in the case of n-Si (positive transient). It was found that in the case of p-Si wafers with negative transient both carrier-lifetime and front surface recombination velocity exhibit changes. A two trap rate model was advanced to explain the positive transient behavior in terms of surface-state annealing and carrier injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical Sciences/Supplements Proceedings of 11th International Conference of Photoacoustic and Photothermal PhenomenaSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207