Osteocalcin is significantly higher in Caucasian pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lower 25(OH)D and higher osteocalcin (OC) concentrations have been observed at mid‐gestation in pregnant women with gestational diabetes (GDM) compared to those without. We aimed to investigate simultaneously 25(OH)D and OC throughout pregnancy in a nested case‐control (48–48) study in Caucasians living in Quebec City (matched for age, season, BMI and length of pregnancy). Maternal serum 25(OH)D and OC were measured by chemiluminescence and ELISA, respectively at 13–16 and 24–28 weeks gestation and at delivery. Differences in concentrations were tested using a MIXED model repeated measures ANOVA. We conclude that 25(OH)D was not significantly different (p=0.260) while OC was significantly higher (p=0.024) in GDM vs healthy pregnant women. Both 25(OH)D and OC increased significantly with time (p<0.001), but there were no interactions between health state with time (p=0.092, p=0.434, respectively). Funded by CIHR. Grant Funding Source : Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".