God and Satan: The Ephemeral Other and the Self-consciousness of Jesusa Palancares in Hasta no verte Jes?s m?o
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este art?culo pretendemos explorar la relaci?n entre el discurso religioso y el modo de actuar de Jesusa Palancares, protagonista de Hasta no verte Jes?s m?o, de Elena Poniatowska. A partir de la conceptualizaci?n de Dios y Satan?s en Jesusa, explicamos primero c?mo dicha conceptualizaci?n est? formada de met?foras tomadas por la protagonista de su medio ambiente, al mismo tiempo que notamos que las met?foras usadas por ella para configurar el Otro no son neutrales sino que llevan una carga ?tica. Segundo, describimos el car?cter independiente y combativo de Jesusa. Finalmente, nuestros comentarios nos sirven como punto de partida de una discusi?n de la manera en que ella entiende su propio ser, discusi?n que emprendemos con el prop?sito de iluminar la tensi?n que se instaura entre la aceptaci?n y el rechazo de los valores ?ticos impl?citos de las met?foras empleadas por Jesusa para conceptualizar el Otro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".