MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W967810751

Truck+ for earthmoving operations

2014· article· en· W967810751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Montaser, Osama Moselhi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information Technology in Construction · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckGlobal Positioning SystemInterface (matter)Graphical user interfaceApplication programming interfaceGeographic information systemSoftwareComponent Object ModelUser interfaceEngineeringTracking systemComputer scienceWeb applicationDatabaseWorld Wide WebOperating systemAutomotive engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an automated system that integrates Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographical Information System (GIS) in a web-based platform named Truck+. It is utilized for estimating, monitoring and forecasting productivity of hauling trucks in earthmoving operations. The developed system consists of GPS for automated site data acquisition, GIS web-based system used as graphical user interface, relational database and Discrete Event Simulation (DES) for stochastic forecasting. The paper also highlights the benefit of utilizing the actual captured data supported by DES for stochastically forecasting productivity of earthmoving operation. DES was applied to forecast productivity in a stochastic approach that makes use of the project’s captured data during the operations involved rather than data from past projects. This makes it more capable of capturing relevant factors that impact project conditions. Truck+ consists primarily of two modules: tracking/monitoring module and forecasting module. The developed system has been implemented in prototype software using object-oriented programming, ArcGIS APIs (Application Programming Interface) and deploys Microsoft Silverlight for creating and delivering rich internet web application and media. Truck+ is capable of generating graphical and tabular reports with various degrees of detail to suit the requirements of project teams. The developed system is applied to a construction project in Montreal area to demonstrate its use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Information Technology in ConstructionSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207