MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W968569077 · doi:10.1177/159101990000600409

Pial Relations with Spinal Cord Veins Explain MRI Occult Spinal AV Shunts

2000· article· en· W968569077 on OpenAlexaff
P. Lasjaunias, C Maillot, Karel G. terBrugge

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomySpinal cordMedicineAnterior spinal arteryPia materLateral funiculusCordSurgeryDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The anatomic findings (figures ​(figures11-​-6)6) demonstrate the different relations between the ventral spinal cord veins and the pial network with the leptomeninges of the cord. The ventral veins are subpial buried in the depths of the ventral fissure; the pial network is located in the subarachnoid space. Figure 1 Thoracic spinal cord ventral view. 1) anterior funiculus; 2) anterior root of the Th 10 spinal nerve; 3) radiculo medullary artery; 4) anterior spinal artery. The subjacent veins are also covered by the linea splendens (arrowheads). Figure 2 Thoracic spinal cord posterior view. The funiculi (3) as well as the veins (2) and the posterior root of the spinal nerves (1) are seen through the arachnoid tissue partially densified (arrowheads). Figure 3 Horizontal section of thoracic spinal cord (luxol fast blue). 1) Linea splendens; 2) Anterior spinal artery and its branches; 3) Ventral spinal cord venous tronc; 4) Anterior medial fissure; 5) Anterior funiculus; 6) Anterior horn; 7) Spinal cord commissure (bar = 300 micrometres). Figure 4 Horizontal section of the spinal cord at cervical level (luxol fast blue). 1) Linea splendens; 2) Unfused anterior spinal artery; 3) Anterior spinal vein covered by fasciculated pia matter. At the level of the ventral medial fissure (5) the technical staining and preparation has separated the pia glia (arrowhead). In its most anterior portion (6), the pia mater remains compact (asterisk) (bar = 200 micrometres). Figure 5 Horizontal section of the cord at cervical level (luxol fast blue). 1) Pial arterial vessels; 2) Posterior root of the spinal nerve; 3) Posterior venous trunk, superficial to the pia mater (arrowheads); 4) Lateral funiculus; 5) Posterior horn; 6) Posterior funiculus; 7) Posterior longitudinal fasciculus (bar = 200 micrometres). Figure 6 Horizontal section of the cord at the cervical segment. The arterioles (1) and the posterior spinal vein (2) run in the subarachnoid space (3). The arachnoid (arrows) and pia mater (arrowheads) are clearly demonstrated. (4) Medial posterior septum (5) posterior funiculus (bar = 200 micrometres). The visibility of the spinal veins therefore depends on the group of veins recruited to drain an arteriovenous shunt. The few cases reported with “occult” MRI examinations and AV shunts secondarily demonstrated by angiography (figures ​(figures77 and ​and8)8) illustrate this difference. Figure 7 Dural AV shunt of the tentorium draining into the spinal cord veins (A and B). The MRI fails to demonstrate perivascular veins (C and D); note the dominant drainage into the ventral spinal cord vein. Figure 8 Spinal cord AV shunt draining into ventral spinal cord vein (A). The MRI fails to demonstrate perivascular veins (B) but shows significant spinal cord ischemia (C). Slow flow lesions draining predominantly into the ventral vein of the cord may be unseen on MRI (figure ​(figure88). The ventral vein being in the depths of the ventral sulcus cannot be seen with myelographic type of sequences. On the contary, any lesion draining predominantly into the pial network and particularly the posterior group, are expected to be demonstrated on myelographic sequences. Normally enlarged pial veins are in fact subarachnoid and can therefore be seen without pathological significance. This disposition suggests that the ischemic consequences related to ventral vein congestion in comparison to the subarachnoid congestion may very well differ. The observed absence of haemorrhage in spinal dural arteriovenous shunt may be related to this anatomic distinction In addition, the absence of subarachnoid haemorrhagic episodes in most spinal AV shunts expresses an unknown property of these veins. It seems that there is no haemorrhagic venous infarction as a consequence of subarachnoid venous congestion. Instead, the subpial congestion resulting from ventral spinal cord vein involvement can lead to manifestations similar to those observed with dural or intracranial pial lesions. The linea splendens may represent ventrally a protective barrier to the congestion provoked by a spinal dural shunt and involve only the subarachnoid network. Further observations both anatomic and hemodynamic are needed to fully understand the physiopathology of spinal AV shunts and their clinical expressions. Ignorance of the venous patterns and absence of venous analysis of spinal cord angiograms still limit discussions on spinal cord ischemia to the arterial causes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207