MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W96921077 · doi:10.7202/001066ar

L’anomie dans la biographie intellectuelle de Durkhein

2002· article· fr· W96921077 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philippe Besnard

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmile Durkheim and Sociology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAnomiePhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nombre de commentateurs ont décelé des inflexions, des discontinuités voire une véritable "coupure" dans l'itinéraire intellectuel de Durkheim. En s'appuyant sur l'état actuel de nos connaissances sur sa biographie tant intellectuelle que personnelle, il est possible de caractériser et dater assez précisément cette rupture contemporaine de Suicide. Même si plusieurs interprétations de Durkheim le présentent comme la sociologie de l'anomie, le concept d'anomie est loin d'être central dans l'ensemble de son œuvre : la production de ce concept coïncide avec une phase critique - anomique - de la biographie intellectuelle du père fondateur de la sociologie française.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.319
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicEmile Durkheim and SociologyFrench-language works237,207