Bibliographic record
Abstract
平稳的启动对SAGD的成功操作是至关重要的。对SAGD井对的启动或者说循环阶段通过数值模拟进行了分析。采用耦合油藏/井筒模型，并用井的现场数据进行了历史拟合，数据由Petro-Canada的MacKay River开发区块大量仪器测得。历史拟合模型后来用于（对井对循环有影响的）某些参数进行敏感性研究。首先，对两种典型的完井方式，蒸汽到达趾端的时间进行了研究，这两种方法是Petro-Canada在MacKay River所用的两种典型井筒完井方法。对这两种完井方式进行了大量的流动速度检验，以弄清蒸汽注入速度如何影响蒸汽到达趾端时间。其次，研究了循环压力和注入/生产井压力梯度。在注入/生产井间采用了不同的压力梯度，以检验其对循环持续时间和蒸汽锥进形成的影响。最后，对注入井和生产井间的距离进行了研究，目的是研究注入/生产井的垂向距离对转换时间的影响。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".