Come in, come in and sit down : seniors in long term care and the local congregation of the United Church of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Come in, come in and sit down-you are a part of the family. 1 We sing this hymn and we mean it-we want people to come in and be comfortable and to join us in worship.But when part of the family can no longer attend church services-when a senior citizen leaves their home to go into long-term care-maybe we need to take the church community to them.This paper explores how the move to long-term care affects the relationship with the United Church congregation and the senior's spiritual needs.Seniors want the connection with their friends and their church family.As important as worship is, the visit and the connection to the community is just as important.Seniors appreciate knowing they are still part of the family of their congregation.As United Church congregations, we need to establish Pastoral Care teams and make a concerted effort to stay connected with our senior members once they have retired to long-term care facilities. 1 James K. Manley, "Come In, Come in and Sit Down."Voices United : The Hymn and Worship Book of the United Church of Canada (Etobicoke, ON: The United Church Publishing House, 1996), 395.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".