MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W970167515

Polish Immigrants’ Search for the Peaceable Kingdom: Andrew J. Borkowski’s Copernicus Avenue

2013· article· en· W970167515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Branach‐Kallas

Bibliographic record

VenueAdam Mickiewicz University Repository (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKingdomCopernicusImmigrationPolitical scienceLawGeologyAstrobiologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article est une étude du recueil de nouvelles Copernicus Avenue (2011) de Andrew J. Borkowski, écrivain canadien d’origine polonaise. L’analyse se concentre sur l’évolution de la diaspora polonaise à Toronto après la Deuxième Guerre mondiale et sur les efforts des immigrants pour reconstruire leur existence au Canada. L’article commence par un aperçu historique sur l’immigration polonaise dans les années d’après-guerre et sur la législation concernant ce groupe ethnique. On vise à analyser les histoires individuelles des refugiés polonais et leur assmilation au Canada à l’exemple de Thadeus Mienkiewicz, le personnage principal de Copernicus Avenue. Discriminé et humilié, Thadeus rêve d’une identité canadienne interprétée comme liberté et succès. Dans Copernicus Avenue, Borkowski établit aussi un dialogue fascinant entre les diasporas polonaise et irlandaise, fondé sur leur expérience d’exclusion sociale partagée. Les concepts de migration et d’identité diasporique sont étudiés du point de vue du constructivisme et des théories du trauma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0000.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdam Mickiewicz University Repository (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan)Same topicCentral European Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207