MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W97026607

Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2Nd Ed.). [L'Encyclopédie De Déontologie Appliquée (2Ième éD.)]

2012· article· fr· W97026607 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean L. Petrifor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncyclopediaHumanitiesLibrary scienceSociologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chadwick, R. (Ed.) (2012). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2nd ed.). [L'Encydopedie de deontologie appliquee (2ieme ed.)] Salt Lake City, UT: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-3736-1.ABSTRACTThe Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics presents short articles on a wide range of topics related to ethics. The second edition (2012) includes issues that have become more significant since the first edition was published in 1998. The articles generally include historical roots, dieories, current status, unresolved issues, and considerations for the future. Professional ethics as a subheading of Applied Ethics is not covered sufficiently to guide busy practitioners to resolve ethical dilemmas that they encounter in practice.RESUMEEEncyclopedia of Applied Ethics [Encyclopedie de deontologie appliquee] presente de courts articles sur une vaste gamme de sujets relatifs a la deontologie. La seconde edition (2012) a inclus des questions qui ont gagne en pertinence depuis la parution de la premiere edition (1998)- Les articles comportent habituellement les sources historiques, les theories, le statut actuel, les questions non resolues, et des considerations pour l'avenir. La deontologie professionnelle en tant que sous-rubrique de la deontologie appliquee n'est pas suffisamment couverte pour guider les praticiens occupes lorsqu'il s'agit de resoudre des dilemmes ethiques auxquels ils doivent faire face dans le cours de leur pratique.My first comment is to advise counsellors who work primarily in providing direct services to clients that the Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics is not a handbook of advice on resolving ethical dilemmas that you encounter in practice. Applied Ethics isa general field of study that includes all systematic efforts to understand and to resolve moral problems that arise in some domain of practical life, as with medicine, journalism, or business, or in connection with some general issue of social concern, such as employment equity or capital punishment. (Winkler, 2012, p. 174)Professional Ediics is one of many subheadings under Applied Ethics.The Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Second Edition contains four volumes or some 330 pages with 408 short articles by 408 authors addressing a comprehensive range of applied ethics topics. These topics are presented alphabetically; thus the volumes resemble a reference dictionary rather than a scholarly journal. The subject classification includes Applied Ethics; Bioethics; Computer and Information Management; Economics/Business; Environmental Ethics; Ethics and Polities; Ethics in Education; Legal; Medical Ethics; Philosophy/Theories; Social; and Social/Media. There is a strong focus on philosophy and history.The second edition is intended to include aspects of society that have changed significantly since the first edition appeared in 1998, including the response to terrorism, biometrie identification, stem cell research, reproductive technologies, environmental issues, and social media· Each volume covers a wide diversity of topics, for example, 1 , A to D, liste topics from Abortion to Dual Use of Biotechnology; Volume 2, E to L, lists topics from Ecological Balance to Loyalty; Volume 3> M to R, lists topics from Machiavellianism to Risk Governance in a Complex World, and Volume 4, S to Z, lists topics from Safety Laws to Zoological Parks.The encyclopedia is a treasure house of information for counsellors who are interested in the application of ethical concepts to a wide range of issues, many of which may not impact their daily practice. The focus of the articles is generon historical roots, theories, Current status, unresolved issues, considerations ally for the future, and references. It is not a handbook or practical guide for ethical decision-making and it does not address specific ethical dilemmas that are frequently encountered in practice.There are articles on ethics and various religious faiths (e. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.069

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207