MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W970503977

Broadband Access:Technologies,Drivers,and Issues

2007· article· ja· W970503977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Gulzari, Khalil, Muhammad Khalil Shahid

Bibliographic record

Venue中国通信:英文版 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandTelecommunicationsBusinessDigital subscriber lineBroadband networksSoftware deploymentInvestment (military)ProductivityEconomic growthEconomicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economic research shows that public infrastructure investment is a powerful driver of business productivity,investment,and economic growth.This paper discusses the drivers for broadband and analyses the various broadband access technologies and their respective market shares.Various policy and regulatory issues are also discussed.Broadband access,along with its extended value-added services and applications,has now become the most important growth driver for fixed operators.Digital Subscriber Line(DSL) is the leading access technology due to already available copper infrastructure and WiMAX is emerging new technology,especially in Asia/Pacific(APAC) region,due to its speedy and low cost infrastructure deployment characteristics. Countries with high penetration of broadband users such as South Korea,Japan and Canada have all implemented conscious policies for the growth of broadband in their countries.Governments in APAC region,especially the developing countries,will have to play the leading role for broadband due to its importance in economic and social growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中国通信:英文版→Same topicICT Impact and Policies→French-language works237,207→