Differences in daily mass gain between subordinate species are explained by differences in ecological plasticity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During winter, small birds in temperate zones increase their internal fat reserves to combat harsh environmental conditions and the drastic reduction in predictability of resource access. High fat reserves provide some benefits related to starvation-risk reduction, but also imply some costs related to increased predation risk. In general, subordinate species should increase their level of fat reserves in response to the unpredictability of resource access when in competition with dominants. However, the magnitude of such reserve increases could differ between subordinate species if opportunity of access to resources varies interspecifically in relation to differences in niche breadth due to differences in morphology. We tested the hypothesis that subordinate species (Parus cristatus) with decreased access to food will accumulate more fat than subordinate species (Parus ater) with greater opportunities. Results supported the prediction. We found that crested tit, the species with lower ecological plasticity and thus less access to food under competition, stores more fat daily than the coal tit, the species with higher ecological plasticity owing to its abiltiy to forage while upside down.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".