Does Particle-Wave Duality within Brain Space Originate from a Recondite Equivalence between Gravitational & Electron Orbit Energy?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The energy within the earth's mass can be calculated to be 10 -18 J/proton with a quantum equivalence resulting in a frequency of about 1.1·10 15 Hz. The comparative frequency for the ground state of the Bohr magneton (atom) is 7.18·10 15 Hz. This difference is within the measurement error of 2π. We offer quantitative solutions to suggest manifestations of gravitational and electromagnetic (wave) energies could alternate with each electron orbit (in the order of 10 -16 s, the time required for a photon to traverse a neuronal cell membrane) resulting in both particle and wave properties. Because the increments of time by which phenomena are measured are much longer, wave-particle duality results from the superimposition of characteristics. There are theoretical ramifications, directly relevant to consciousness, for quantitative solutions that relate the gravitational energy between a proton and an electron applied over the standing wavelength of the electromagnetic orbital frequency to the upper limit of the rest mass of the photon. Under optimal conditions one manifestation of gravitational-electromagnetic convergence may occur within molecular structures at concentrations of approximately a femtomole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it