La perception du Canada à travers les magazines Time et Newsweek : 1995-2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La perception du Canada a travers les magazines Time et Newsweek (1995-2000) decrit la presence canadienne dans deux principaux magazines americains d’informations. Le Canada apparait comme un pays paisible, meme si, les journalistes des deux magazines presentent des articles sur des actes de violence impliquant des Canadiens. Le Canada est une nation multiculturelle, et sur ce plan, des conflits existent. Les Quebecois sont divises au sujet de la question de leur appartenance au Canada et beaucoup d’autres communautes ressentent les effets de l’exclusion (racisme…) ; les Inuit et les Quebecois francophones ont choisi le nationalisme pour exprimer leurs identites distinctes. Alors que les Canadiens de diverses origines se preoccupent de leur identite sur le plan national, le pays dans son ensemble ressent l’impact de la presence americaine. Alors que les Canadiens se focalisent sur la consistance de leur identite nationale, les journalistes de Time et de Newsweek percoivent le Canada comme un pays distinct ayant ses propres traits identitaires : le respect de la paix, celui des diversites culturelles, ou encore celui de la nature ; des caracteristiques qui representent le Canada dans le monde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".