Synaptic differentiation between two phasic motoneurons to a crayfish fast muscle.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synaptic differentiation among crustacean phasic motoneurons was investigated by characterizing the synaptic output and nerve terminal morphology of the two axons to the adductor exopodite muscle in the crayfish uropod. The muscle is of the fast type with short sarcomeres (2-3 micro m) and a low thin to thick filament number (6:1). On single muscle fibers, excitatory postsynaptic potentials generated by the large-diameter axon are significantly larger than those by the small-diameter axon suggesting a presynaptic origin for these differences. Nerve terminals arising from these two axons have typical phasic features, filiform shape and a low (6-8%) mitochondrial density. Synaptic contacts are similar in size between the two axons as is the length and number of active zone dense bars at these synapses. The large-diameter axon, however, exhibits a twofold larger area of nerve terminal than the small-diameter axon resulting in a higher density of synapses per muscle fiber. Hence, differences in synaptic density may in part account for differences in synaptic output between these paired phasic axons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".