MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W980785514

Higher-accuracy method for measuring minichromosome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

2002· article· en· W980785514 on OpenAlexaff
David J H Kramer, Laura D. Gauthier, Krassimir Yankulov

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinichromosomeMinichromosome maintenanceReplication (statistics)Saccharomyces cerevisiaeBiologyPlasmidDNA replicationComputational biologyMutationCell biologyGeneticsDNAMolecular biologyGeneOrigin of replicationGenomeVirology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The minichromosome maintenance assay isfrequently used to characterize mutations genetically that affect the initiation of DNA replication or to decipherfunctional components in autonomously replicating sequences. The assay determines minichromosome loss by measuring the percentage of plasmid-containing cells in cultures after a period of growth in nonselective medium. Here we analyze data acquisition errors that contribute to the low accuracy of the routine versions of the assay. We propose modifications that eliminate errors in the acquisition of two variables and significantly improve the accuracy of the assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207