Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Discussion Paper introduces the Sustainable Churchill initiative between the Town of Churchill and the University of Winnipeg.It provides an overview of major concepts, including what is meant by community sustainability, with the intention that area residents will be better able to participate at the upcoming "Community Visioning" and other engagement sessions from August 31st to September 2nd, 2009.The Discussion Paper is intended to help generate a more effective partnership between the residents of the Town and the University of Winnipeg, by giving all parties a starting point for discussion and planning.It will help set the foundation for Churchill's Sustainability Plan. What is a Sustainability Plan?Every municipality in Manitoba has an official Development Plan and accompanying Zoning by-law detailing how the community is to be physically organized and built; Churchill's was prepared in 1999 and is overdue for revision.However, the existing Development Plan is concerned only with land use and the built environment and not with other important parts of a community's quality of life, such as social, economic, aesthetic and ecological factors.The Churchill Sustainability Plan would seek to provide these missing pieces by developing a holistic perspective on the Town.It would ask, how can the Town be planned in such a way as to provide the highest quality of life for all of its residents, and for the long term? Background
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it