On The Usual Fibonacci and Generalized Order-k Pell Numbers.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we give some relations involving the usual Fibonacci and generalized order-k Pell numbers. These relations show that the generalized order-k Pell numbers can be expressed as the summation of the usual Fibonacci numbers. We nd families of Hessenberg matrices such that the permanents of these matrices are the usual Fibonacci numbers, F2i 1; and their sums. Also extending these matrix representations, we nd families of super-diagonal matrices such that the permanents of these matrices are the generalized order-k Pell numbers and their sums. 1. Introduction The well-known Fibonacci sequence fFng is de ned by the following recursive relation, for n > 2; Fn = Fn 1 + Fn 2: with initial conditions F1 = F2 = 1: The Pell sequence fPng is de ned recursively by the equation, for n > 2 Pn = 2Pn 1 + Pn 2 (1.1) where P1 = 1; P2 = 2: In [5], Ercolano gave the matrix method for generating the Pell sequence as follows: M = Pn+1 Pn Pn Pn 1 (1.2) The permanent of an n-square matrix A = (aij) is de ned by
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it