MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W986613 · doi:10.4000/pistes.3812

Prise en charge de la sécurité dans les petites entreprises manufacturières : état de la situation et pistes pour l’intervention et la recherche

2000· article· fr· W986613 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Danièle Champoux, Jean‐Pierre Brun

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La problématique de la prévention au travail dans les petites entreprises (PE) de moins de 50 travailleurs a, jusqu’à présent, été peu abordée au Québec, que ce soit en terme de recherche ou en ce qui a trait au soutien à la prise en charge de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (SST). Les estimations suggèrent que le niveau de risque dans les PE est particulièrement élevé, que les ressources humaines, économiques et technologiques y sont faibles et que les moyens développés à l’intention de la grande entreprise ne peuvent être transférés à la petite entreprise. Cet article, issu d’une étude conduite par entrevues téléphoniques avec des patrons de PE manufacturières, donne un aperçu des représentations et des pratiques les plus caractéristiques en ce qui a trait à la SST et à la prévention. Les résultats de cette étude exploratoire servent à faire une première évaluation des besoins des PE et orienteront les interventions et les recherches futures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santéSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207