MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W987652963 · doi:10.26512/2006.12.tcc.948

Captura de imagens e estimação de movimento em ambiente linux

2006· dissertation· pt· W987652963 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Emídio de Rezende

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Nurses in Oncology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOperating systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tiago Alves que dedicou um grande tempo a esclarecer as dúvidas do autor.Ao Rafael Galvão que forneceu uma valiosa contribuição bibliografica sem a qual o projeto não seria possível.Daniel Emídio de Rezende RESUMO O trabalho a seguir tem o objetivo apresentar um novo modo para os usuários do Ambiente Linux controle a posição do ponteiro do mouse, utilizando uma webcam para captura de imagens e extranindo informações de movimento destas imagens para alterar a posição do ponteiro.Para isso, o autor portou uma interface semelhante desenvolvida para o Sistema Operacional Microsoft Windows para o Ambiente Linux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207