MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W988152187

中/高密度纤维板加工工艺及新技术开发——加拿大国家林产工业技术研究院MDF/HDF实验中心侧访

2006· article· zh· W988152187 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
向琴, 姜征

Bibliographic record

Venue木材工业 · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEngineering
TopicForest Biomass Utilization and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

加拿大森林资源丰富,林产工业是其重要产业之一,2004年其MDF产年量达157万m^3,约占北美地区MDF年总产量的30%,并且近年来一直保持着稳步的发展态势。加拿大国家林产工业技术研究院(Forintek)是该国唯一的国家林产工业研究机构,对加拿大林产工业的发展起到举足轻重的作用。Forintek总部位于温哥华(Vancouver)市,并在魁北克(Quebec)省Sainte—Foy市设有一个研究分院,在渥太华(Ottawa)等其他主要省/市还设有多个办事处,便于与工厂加强联系。为支持、适应北美地区MDF/HDF的发展,Forintek在Quebec研究分院专门成立了一个MDF/HDF实验中心。获悉2005年秋,我国人造板行业的知名专家——东北林业大学陆仁书教授应邀前往Quebec分院访问。笔者慕名就该院MDF/HDF实验中心的运作及研究状况采访了陆教授,并作此篇报道,以飨读者。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue木材工业Same topicForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementFrench-language works237,207