Más allá de la inversión paródica: la crítica del género de capa y espada y del drama de honor en el entremés de "El marión" de Quevedo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La primera y la segunda partes del Entremés famoso del marión de Quevedo presentan un juicio crítico sobre el género de capa y espada y el drama de honor. Esta crítica se elabora por medio de mecanismos cómicos con los que se hace reír al público de convencionalismos dramáticos que se repiten en exceso. La primera parte de El marión parodia situaciones, personajes y el lenguaje dramático mientras que la segunda parte constituye además una continuación burlesca de los fines de comedia con matrimonios dispares. El marión no se limita a examinar los defectos de sus modelos sino que además procura señalar derroteros para escribir con ingenio. La crítica literaria de estos dos entremeses va acompañada por un comentario social y moral que parte de la figura del varón afeminado, Costanzo, y de su matrimonio desavenido con María.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".