Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vouloir appliquer le concept d'union libre à l'Afrique ajoute au risque permanent d'ethnocentrisme sur le thème de la nuptialité et de la famille. Pourtant, la question fondamentale que pose l'union libre est celle des compromis entre les aspirations de l'individu et du couple d'une part et les contraintes communautaires et de droit d'autre part. Au Togo, le développement de la sexualité prénuptiale, l'individualisation croissante du choix du conjoint et l'évolution des procédures d'entrée en union témoignent de l'affaiblissement progressif du contrôle familial sur la conclusion des unions. La progression des unions informelles, souvent sans cohabitation des partenaires, renvoie à des effets probables de la crise économique, à une certaine précarisation de la vie sociale. Mais la crise n'est pas seule en cause. La vie en ville et l'accès à l'école, à l'emploi hors de la famille et aux médias favorisent l'acquisition d'une certaine autonomie féminine dont ces changements de comportement sont révélateurs. Ils sont le signe d'une modification des rapports entre hommes et femmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".