MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W992133030

以高产恢复系“中413”为背景的导入系群体粒型和耐旱性筛选鉴定

2005· article· zh· W992133030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
梅捍卫, 罗利军, 徐小艳, 余新桥, 童汉华, 王逸平, 郭龙彪, 应存山, 吴金红, 陈宏伟

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2005
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

以高产恢复系中413为轮回亲本,导入来自149份供体亲本的遗传成份,育成约2 500个株系的导入系群体.经目测选择粒长明显高于轮回亲本的株系并测量其粒长、粒宽,发现有667个株系的粒长超过7.0mm,粒长最大可达10.6mm,平均8.4mm;粒宽变幅为2.0~3.8mm,长宽比变幅为2.3~4.3,与轮回亲本相比粒型变化明显.在强水分胁迫条件下,导入系在卷叶级别和冠层温度等指标上有巨大变幅,发现有47个株系的卷叶级别和近100个株系的冠层温度低于轮回亲本,有16个株系的卷叶级别和冠层温度指标均低于耐旱对照品种中旱3号.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207