The impact of rosiglitazone on nitric oxide bioavailability and endothelial function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical studies have demonstrated that rosiglitazone can improve vascular function in patients with diabetes mellitus. It remains unclear whether this effect depends on a direct improvement in endothelial function or whether it is mediated by the drug's effect on glycemic control. Yet, rosiglitazone has been linked to serious cardiovascular events. A number of studies recently investigated whether rosiglitazone affects endothelial function in healthy volunteers and patients with cardiovascular disease. Controversial observations have been reported; the observation that rosiglitazone might in certain cases impair endothelial function may suggest a mechanistic explanation for the observation of increased cardiovascular events in patients treated with rosiglitazone who have underlying cardiovascular disease. These studies are summarized and discussed in the present paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it