MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W99933349

A Case of Neurological Symptoms and Severe Urinary Retention on a Pediatric Ward: Is this Conversion Disorder?

2013· article· en· W99933349 on OpenAlexaff
Varinderjit Parmar, Nasreen Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversion disorderEtiologySexual abuseMedicinePsychiatryPediatricsPsychologyMedical emergencyInjury preventionPoison control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: a) To illustrate the etiological role of sexual and physical abuse in the development of childhood conversion disorder b) to highlight the importance of collaborative care in cases of conversion disorder c) to identify particular areas or needs for future research in the topic. METHOD: We discuss the case of a fifteen-year old girl who was admitted to pediatrics with medically unexplained neurological complaints, chiefly urinary retention. Psychiatry was consulted after all organic work up was completed. Patient was transferred to the psychiatry ward and we present the unfolding of this case. Pediatrics and psychiatry generated a collaborative management plan. RESULTS: The patient presented, initially, with tremors, severe urinary retention and constipation. After her second admission to pediatrics, for severe urinary retention, the girl disclosed chronic sexual and physical abuse and neglect. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion symptoms often occur in cases of severe psychosocial stresses including sexual and physical abuse. This case highlights the importance of interdisciplinary professional collaboration in the management of complex presentations with unexplained symptoms and psychosocial stressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments→French-language works237,207→