MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,914 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,914 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 39

Labels cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affgemma · metaresearch+bibliometricsgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Level of Evidence in Orthopaedic Journals
William T. Obremskey, Nick Pappas, Emad Attallah-Wasif, Paul Tornetta, Mohit Bhandari
2005· article· en· Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
324
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology
Mark Crowther, Wendy Lim
2010· review· en· Blood· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
308
citations
afffundaboutgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Reciprocity
Sarah Maiter, Laura Simich, Nora Jacobson, Julie Wise
2008· article· en· Action Research· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
274
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Firm action needed on predatory journals
Jocalyn Clark, Russell Smith
2015· editorial· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
243
citations
afffundgemma · research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L. McGuire, Mildred K. Cho, Janet A. Buchanan, Michael Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk +17 more
2008· article· en· PLoS Biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
241
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research
Thomas W. Concannon, Sean Grant, Vivian Welch, Jennifer Petkovic, Joseph V. Selby, Sally Crowe +5 more
2018· review· en· Journal of General Internal Medicine· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
232
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · no categorymodels split
GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations
Holger J. Schünemann, Andrew D Oxman, Jan Brożek, Paul Glasziou, Patrick Bossuyt, Stephanie Chang +3 more
2008· editorial· en· Evidence-Based Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
231
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Registered Replication Report
Victoria K. Alogna, Matthew K. Attaya, Philip Aucoin, Štěpán Bahník, Stacy Birch, Angela R. Birt +84 more
2014· article· en· Perspectives on Psychological Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
224
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Weapons of mass retraction
Lori L. Burrows
2005· review· en· Molecular Microbiology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
203
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearchgpt · no categorymodels split
Positive Epidemiology?
Tyler J. VanderWeele, Ying Chen, Katelyn Long, Eric S. Kim, Claudia Trudel‐Fitzgerald, Laura D. Kubzansky
2019· article· en· Epidemiology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
179
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadmodels split
PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study
Susan Armijo‐Olivo, Bruno R. da Costa, Greta G. Cummings, Christine Ha, Jorge Fuentes, Humam Saltaji +1 more
2015· review· en· PLoS ONE· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
173
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About