Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twitching motility is a unique form of bacterial propulsion on solid surfaces associated with cycles of extension, tethering and retraction of type IV pili (T4P). Although investigations over the last two decades in a number of species have identified the majority of the genes involved in this process, we are still learning how these pili are assembled and the mechanics by which bacteria use T4P to drag themselves from one place to another. Among the puzzles that remain to be solved is the mechanism by which hydrolysis of ATP is coupled to pilus assembly and disassembly, and how the cell envelope structure is modified to accommodate the passage of the pilus through the periplasm. Unravelling of these and other enigmas in the T4P system will not only teach us more about these important colonization and virulence factors, but also help us to understand related processes such as type II secretion, which relies on a set of proteins homologous to those in the T4P system, and bacterial conjugation, involving retractable pili belonging to the F-like subgroup of the type IV secretion family. This review focuses on recent discoveries relating to the assembly and function of T4P in generation of twitching motility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | MetaresearchResearch integrity Domain: Evaluation · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | MetaresearchScholarly communicationResearch integrity Domain: Evaluation · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it