MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,914 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,914 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 39

Labels cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun, Kelly K. O’Brien
2010· article· en· Implementation Science· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
14,722
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P. A. Ioannidis +4 more
2009· article· en· Italian Journal of Public Health· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
3,454
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, Jan Brożek, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, David M. Rind +14 more
2011· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2,682
citations
fundno affgpt · no categorygrok · no categoryopus · metaresearchmodels split
Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study
Thomas J. Waltz, Byron J. Powell, Monica M. Matthieu, Laura J. Damschroder, Matthew Chinman, Jeffrey L. Smith +2 more
2015· article· en· Implementation Science· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1,177
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
A scoping review of rapid review methods
Andrea C. Tricco, Jesmin Antony, Wasifa Zarin, Lisa Strifler, Marco Ghassemi, John D. Ivory +4 more
2015· review· en· BMC Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1,156
citations
affgemma · bibliometrics+metaresearchgpt · bibliometrics+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing
Anton Ninkov, Jason R. Frank, Lauren A. Maggio
2021· article· en· Perspectives on Medical Education· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
938
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology)
Sandeep Moola, Zachary Munn, Kim Sears, Raluca Sfetcu, Marian J. Currie, Karolina Lisy +4 more
2015· article· en· International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
801
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews
Cindy Stern, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Judith Carrier, Christina Godfrey, Kendra L. Rieger, Susan Salmond +3 more
2020· article· en· JBI Evidence Synthesis· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
664
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography
Sarah Wall
2008· article· en· International Journal of Qualitative Methods· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
646
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature
Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Sam Work, Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein
2017· review· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
571
citations
affno abstractgpt · no categorygrok · no categoryopus · metaresearchmodels split
Exploring Social Desirability Bias
Janne Chung, Gary S. Monroe
2003· article· en· Journal of Business Ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
552
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearchgpt · scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
An international registry of systematic-review protocols
Alison Booth, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, David Moher, Mark Petticrew, Lesley Stewart
2010· article· en· The Lancet· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
521
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Modeling Good Research Practices—Overview
J. Jaime, Andrew Briggs, Uwe Siebert, Karen M. Kuntz
2012· review· en· Medical Decision Making· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
511
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
Blakeley B. McShane, Ulf Böckenholt, Karsten T. Hansen
2016· review· en· Perspectives on Psychological Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
407
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+open_sciencegpt · scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
The TRUST Principles for digital repositories
Dawei Lin, Jonathan Crabtree, Ingrid Dillo, Robert R. Downs, Rorie Edmunds, David Giaretta +13 more
2020· article· en· Scientific Data· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
390
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Challenges in administrative data linkage for research
Katie Harron, Chris Dibben, James Boyd, Anders Hjern, Mahmoud Azimaee, Maurício L. Barreto +1 more
2017· article· en· Big Data & Society· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
356
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
Brian A. Nosek, Emorie D Beck, Lorne Campbell, Jessica Kay Flake, Tom E Hardwicke, David Thomas Mellor +2 more
2019· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · metaresearch
355
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About