MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

570 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
570 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 12

Labels cover 570 of 570 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 570 of 570 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundaboutgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Reciprocity
Sarah Maiter, Laura Simich, Nora Jacobson, Julie Wise
2008· article· en· Action Research· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
274
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Firm action needed on predatory journals
Jocalyn Clark, Russell Smith
2015· editorial· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
243
citations
afffundgemma · research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L. McGuire, Mildred K. Cho, Janet A. Buchanan, Michael Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk +17 more
2008· article· en· PLoS Biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
241
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Weapons of mass retraction
Lori L. Burrows
2005· review· en· Molecular Microbiology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
203
citations
affgemma · research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Internet Communities
Sarah Flicker, Dave Haans, Harvey A. Skinner
2004· article· en· Qualitative Health Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
158
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
Kelly D. Cobey, Manoj M. Lalu, Becky Skidmore, Nadera Ahmadzai, Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher
2018· review· en· F1000Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
154
citations
afffundvenuegemma · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+bibliometrics+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
How predatory journals leak into PubMed
Andrea Manca, David Moher, Lucia Cugusi, Zeevi Dvir, Franca Deriu
2018· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · none
146
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
Kelly D. Cobey, Manoj M. Lalu, Becky Skidmore, Nadera Ahmadzai, Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher
2018· review· en· F1000Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
141
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · research_integritymodels split
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
Vanja Pupovac, Daniele Fanelli
2014· review· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
132
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · research_integritymodels split
Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor
Tiffany I. Leung, Taiane de Azevedo Cardoso, Amaryllis Mavragani, Günther Eysenbach
2023· editorial· en· Journal of Medical Internet Research· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
105
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals
Lorraine E. Ferris, Margaret A. Winker
2017· review· en· Biochemia Medica· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
97
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science
Elise Smith, Bryn Williams–Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul‐Hus +2 more
2019· article· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
81
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers
Philippe Mongeon, Vincent Larivière
2015· article· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
81
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Haunted Manuscripts: Ghost Authorship in the Medical Literature
Stephanie Ngai, Jennifer Gold, Sudeep S. Gill, Paula A. Rochon
2005· article· en· Accountability in Research· Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
75
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews
Danielle B. Rice, Becky Skidmore, Kelly D. Cobey
2021· letter· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
73
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retractions in orthopaedic research
James Yan, Austin MacDonald, L-P. Baisi, Nathan Evaniew, Mohit Bhandari, Michelle Ghert
2016· article· en· Bone and Joint Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
67
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams
Elise Smith, Bryn Williams–Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul‐Hus +4 more
2019· article· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
67
citations
affgemma · research_integritygpt · no categorymodels split
Plagiarism detection using feature-based neural networks
Steve Engels, Vivek Lakshmanan, Michelle Craig
2007· article· en· ACM SIGCSE Bulletin· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
58
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews
Adrienne Stevens, Mona Hersi, Chantelle Garritty, Lisa Hartling, Beverley Shea, Lesley Stewart +2 more
2024· article· en· BMJ evidence-based medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
55
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review
Justin Wang, Jerry C. Ku, Naif M. Alotaibi, James T. Rutka
2017· review· en· World Neurosurgery· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
53
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research
Anna Abalkina, René Aquarius, Elisabeth M. Bik, David Bimler, Dorothy Bishop, Jennifer A. Byrne +4 more
2025· article· en· Nature· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
50
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About