MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,914 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,914 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 39

Labels cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,914 of 1,914 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews
Danielle B. Rice, Becky Skidmore, Kelly D. Cobey
2021· letter· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
73
citations
afffundgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgrok · no categoryopus · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy
Joshua A. Berman, Collins Mitambo, Beatrice Matanje-Mwagomba, Shiraz Khan, Chiyembekezo Kachimanga, Emily B Wroe +7 more
2015· article· en· Health Research Policy and Systems· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
71
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
Improving the process of research ethics review
Stacey Page, Jeffrey Nyeboer
2017· editorial· en· Research Integrity and Peer Review· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
67
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams
Elise Smith, Bryn Williams–Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul‐Hus +4 more
2019· article· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
67
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retractions in orthopaedic research
James Yan, Austin MacDonald, L-P. Baisi, Nathan Evaniew, Mohit Bhandari, Michelle Ghert
2016· article· en· Bone and Joint Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
67
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · no categorymodels split
A debate on innovation surveys
Mónica Salazar Villanea, Adam Holbrook
2004· article· en· Science and Public Policy· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
66
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_broadmodels agree
The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study
Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Sarah Daisy Kosa, Daeria O. Lawson, Rosa Stalteri, Oluwatobi R. Olaiya, Ahlam Alotaibi +1 more
2019· article· en· Pilot and Feasibility Studies· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
65
citations
fundno affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative research articles
Lone Schou, Helle Høstrup, Elin Egholm Lyngsø, Susan Larsen, Ingrid Poulsen
2011· article· en· Journal of Advanced Nursing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
65
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About