MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

570 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
570 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 12

Labels cover 570 of 570 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 570 of 570 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels agree
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
Daeria O. Lawson, Michael Ke Wang, Kevin Kim, Rachel Eikelboom, Myanca Rodrigues, Daniela Trapsa +2 more
2022· letter· en· Trials· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Cognitive Bias in the Peer Review Process
Chris Street, Kerry Ward
2019· article· en· ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
affgemma · research_integritygpt · no categorymodels split
Clinical Ethics versus Clinical Research
Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz
2006· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Analysis of potential predatory journals in radiology
Serkan Arıbal, Okan İnce, Eyüp Kaya, Hakan Önder
2020· article· en· Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractgemma · stsgpt · research_integritymodels split
Relativism, Retraction, and Evidence
Diana Raffman
2016· article· en· Philosophy and Phenomenological Research· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study
Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, Miloslav Klugar, Anna Mae Scott +6 more
2023· article· en· Research Synthesis Methods· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
10
citations
fundno affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers
Shahan Ali Memon, Kinga Makovi, Bedoor AlShebli
2025· article· en· Nature Human Behaviour· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundgemma · research_integrity+metaresearchgpt · open_sciencemodels split
Data sharing ethics toolkit: The Human Cell Atlas
Emily Kirby, Alexander Bernier, Roderic Guigó, B Wold, Fabiana Arzuaga, Mayumi Kusunose +2 more
2024· review· en· Nature Communications· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communication+research_integritygpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy
Dan Harms
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+research_integrityconsensus · none
10
citations
affvenuegemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Predatory Journals : Do Not Enter
Faizan Khan, David Moher
2017· article· en· University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractRetractiongemma · research_integritygpt · research_integritymodels agree
Retraction Note: MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of PTSD: study design and rationale for phase 3 trials based on pooled analysis of six phase 2 randomized controlled trials
Michael C. Mithoefer, Allison A. Feduccia, Lisa Jerome, Anne Mithoefer, Mark T. Wagner, Zach Walsh +4 more
2024· retraction· en· Psychopharmacology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology
Tamás Nagy, Jane Hergert, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Lukas Wallrich, Kathleen Schmidt, Talia Waltzer +12 more
2025· article· en· Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
9
citations
affvenuegemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Self-Reporting in Plagiarism Research: How Honest is This Approach?
Julia Ann Colella-Sandercock
2016· article· en· Journal of research practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
9
citations
afffundaboutgemma · research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Pragmatic clinical trials and the consent process
Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield
2017· article· en· Research Ethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
8
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broad+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Selective outcome reporting across psychopharmacotherapy randomized controlled trials
Michelle Lancee, Marleen Schuring, Joeri K. Tijdink, An‐Wen Chan, Christiaan H. Vinkers, Jurjen J. Luykx
2021· article· en· International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
8
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
AI disclosure, moral shame, and the punishment of honesty
Aorigele Bao, Yi Zeng
2025· article· en· Accountability in Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
7
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Research integrity: learning from collective action in Nepal
Bibek Dahal, Shristi Rijal
2022· article· en· FACETS· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
6
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integrity+bibliometricsgpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Disseminating Biomedical Research: Predatory Journals and Practices
Hassan Khan, Mona Ghannad, David Moher
2022· article· en· Indian Journal of Rheumatology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
6
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broad+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+metaepi_broadmodels split
Many randomized trials in a large systematic review were not registered and had evidence of selective outcome reporting: a metaepidemiological study
Samuel Silva, Sareen Singh, Shazia Kashif, Rachel Ogilvie, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Jill A. Hayden
2024· review· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
6
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Research on policy mechanisms to address funding bias and conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a scoping review
S. Scott Graham, Quinn Grundy, Nandini Sharma, Joshua B. Barbour, Justin F. Rousseau, Zoltan P. Majdik +1 more
2025· review· en· Research Integrity and Peer Review· Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About