MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

864 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
864 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 18

Labels cover 133 of 864 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 864 of 864 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review
Olivia Leslie Holden, Meghan E. Norris, Valerie A. Kuhlmeier
2021· review· en· Frontiers in Education· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+research_integrityconsensus · research_integrity
285
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Understanding Academic Misconduct
Julia Hughes, Donald L. McCabe
2006· article· en· Canadian Journal of Higher Education· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
202
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · research_integritymodels split
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
Vanja Pupovac, Daniele Fanelli
2014· review· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity
132
citations
affunlabeled
Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey
Anthony Bozzo, Kamal Bali, Nathan Evaniew, Michelle Ghert
2017· article· en· Research Integrity and Peer Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
83
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers
Philippe Mongeon, Vincent Larivière
2015· article· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
81
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science
Elise Smith, Bryn Williams–Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul‐Hus +2 more
2019· article· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
81
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Academic Integrity in Canada
2022· book· en· Ethics and integrity in educational contexts· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · research_integrity
81
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retractions in orthopaedic research
James Yan, Austin MacDonald, L-P. Baisi, Nathan Evaniew, Mohit Bhandari, Michelle Ghert
2016· article· en· Bone and Joint Research· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
67
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Using Learning Analytics for Preserving Academic Integrity
Alexander Amigud, Joan Arnedo-Moreno, Τhanasis Daradoumis, Ana‐Elena Guerrero‐Roldán
2017· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
61
citations
affunlabeled
Effectiveness of online assessment
Denise M. Woit, Dave Mason
2003· article· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
affgemma · research_integritygpt · no categorymodels split
Plagiarism detection using feature-based neural networks
Steve Engels, Vivek Lakshmanan, Michelle Craig
2007· article· en· ACM SIGCSE Bulletin· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · research_integrity
58
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels agree
Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review
Justin Wang, Jerry C. Ku, Naif M. Alotaibi, James T. Rutka
2017· review· en· World Neurosurgery· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrityconsensus · none
53
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Salami-slicing and plagiarism: How should we respond?
Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rachel Ellaway, Geoff Norman
2019· editorial· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrityconsensus · research_integrity
50
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About