MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

223 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
223 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 5

Labels cover 0 of 223 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 223 of 223 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Evidence-Based Assessment
John Hunsley, Eric J. Mash
2007· review· en· Annual Review of Clinical Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
522
citations
afffundunlabeled
Occipital bending in depression
Jerome J. Maller, Richard H. Thomson, Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld, Rodney Anderson, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Paul B. Fitzgerald
2014· article· en· Brain· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
87
citations
affunlabeled
Implications of test revisions for research.
Esther Strauss, Otfried Spreen, Michael Hunter
2000· article· en· Psychological Assessment· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
50
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Basic Personality Inventory
Ronald R. Holden, G. Cynthia Fekken
2020· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mine Is Bigger Than Yours
David L. Streiner, Geoffrey R. Norman
2012· article· en· CHEST Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Corrections to
Donald H. Saklofske, Best wishes, Jerry Sattler
2002· article· en· Canadian Journal of School Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Norms, norming, and clinical assessment.
John Hunsley, Gina Di Giulio
2001· article· en· Clinical Psychology Science and Practice· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
16
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About