MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

941 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
941 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 19

Labels cover 0 of 941 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 941 of 941 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
The Incidental Question
Paul Torremans
2017· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
<b>Teaching Note</b>—Bidding on Priceline
Chris Anderson, John G. Wilson, Guoren Zhang
2008· article· en· INFORMS Transactions on Education· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Promise of Legality
2025· book· en· Hart Publishing eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
George M. Duck Lecture
Yasir A. Naqvi
2018· article· en· Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
La Cour suprême et les communications
Raynold Langlois
2005· article· en· Les Cahiers de droit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Conflict of Laws Within The Uk
Kirsty J Hood
2007· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Pragmatism Rules
Look Chan Ho
2001· article· en· International and Comparative Law Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
John Jackson: A Tribute
Jagdish N. Bhagwati
2016· article· en· World Trade Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
William Mullins-Johnson, Patricia Zehr
2008· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Introduction
Jud Mathews
2018· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Summary of MC99 Judicial Decisions 2012
George N. Tompkins
2013· article· en· Air and Space Law· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Statutory Reform in Other Jurisdictions
G.J. Tolhurst
2025· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
9. Exemption clauses
Ruth Atkins
2022· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The Place of Gladue in Constitutional Law
Lisa Kerr
2024· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Note from the Editor
Corne Schutte
2025· article· en· The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Summary of MC99 Judicial Updates 2013
George N. Tompkins
2014· article· en· Air and Space Law· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Chapter 7: Article 21—Adoption
Gerison Lansdown
2022· book-chapter· en· Children's well-being· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About